The art of giving is selfless in the effort to mend what is broken. In Asia, a broken porcelain is repaired by melted gold to signify the value of the porcelain to the owner. Non-value items are discarded and simply replaced with equal to less value. People are viewed the same. The tiers of validation in someone's life is important to the existence of human kind. MommyNMeTours, is in the business to offer minimum necessary in the discretion of the recipient.
Recipients are often offended when given consignments because of obvious needs the recipient attempt to hide. The giver's acknowledgement of gifts hurt because obvious needs are not an accustom deficient. Obvious needs are foreign to the recipient and difficult to rationalize why the need has surface in such a manner. Even if the recipient seek assistance through an established non-profit organization the fulfillment of obvious needs are a mark of shame due to an area in life that is usually recognized as sentimental.
To give is a selfless act of artistry. Artistry is present in the act to give because the items that are up for grabs rather through yard sell or goodwill are items that were selected according to preferences of the ownership's style and the purpose the item would serve. Selfless is the act of willingness to meet a recipient in the recipient's vulnerable state of mind without due creditability. The right time to reach out to the recipient is when the act of giving is selfless.
In the same breath, it is completely unfair to label recipients of giving without acceptance of con artistry. A con Artist is a giver of sorrow. The actions of a con artist is to remind the recipient of failures recognized or that are subconscious. The direct opposite of selfless, instead, selfish. Allow me to provide an example:
Con Artist: "Hey, man! It is cold outside, where is your coat?"
Recipient: "I don't know. I don't know."
Con Artist: "Take this jacket. It's all I have to use."
Recipient receives jacket.
2 months later:
Con Artist: "Hey man, how did that coat hold up."
Recipient: "What coat?"
Con Artist: "I was with my family when I gave you a coat 2 months ago. If I hadn't gave you that coat you would had froze."
On the bright side, harmful myths about recipients exists. These myths are listed on the bright side because of the opportunity to debunk unfair allocations. Every testimony has an antagonist that clings to the shadow of assumptions. Truthfully, I don't believe people who are faced with the sight of recipients purposefully act in the shadow of assumption. I believe the shadow of assumptions are defense mechanisms used to rebuke unwelcomed omens. Consequently, the antagonist does not have the power to defeat the leap of the recipient and will later swap shoes with the recipient. Learn the art of giving to repair value.
TTYL,
MommyNMeTours 💋
